Schools of Thought: Keynesian vs. Classical
Keynesian and classical schools of economic thought are competing perspectives on economic models and how they should deal with certain obstacles.
Classical
Classical economists fundamentally believe that markets are self-correcting, therefore the role of government should be minimal in order to let the “market take its course.”
Classical Model Diagram
Keynesian View
Keynesian economists believe that markets can fail in the short run and therefore require active stimulation from the government or central bank in downturns. While acknowledging potential side effects of fiscal or monetary policy, they believe the net effect can be positive.
Keynesian Model Diagram
Use in Round
Argument Strength + Analysis Rebuttals
“Government stimulation (spending) is a net positive.”

Link: Multiplier effect – government demand stimulation increases activity and market liquidity.
There is no single correct answer, so persuasion depends on the judge’s economic views. This can take a long time to debate and risks confusing the judge. However, it also increases employment and liquidity. Can lead to inflation, debt, inefficiency. Wage/price controls interfere with allocation. May crowd out private investment in loanable funds.
“The market always self-corrects, leaving it alone is best.”

Link: Supply and demand sort themselves out eventually.
Some judges may agree, especially if the logic is clear. But it weakens your ability to argue short-term harms, which opponents can exploit heavily. Short-term pain remains unaddressed (e.g. sticky wages). Stagflation proves markets can't always self-correct. Fiscal policy becomes essential.